Thursday, October 16, 2014

The Case of Royal Twins

On the final months of her pregnancy, Princess Charlene revealed she will be having twins and her prince of course is absolutely happy. Twins born among royals are no longer surprising. Prince Frederick of Denmark and Princess Mary had twins following two children, but what really made Charlene's twins different is that these children are in direct succession to the Monegasque throne and determining who will be put in the first line could be a little tricky.
His Serene Highness, Prince Albert of Monaco with his pregnant wife, Princess Charlene
She's carrying a set of twins that are first to be born to a reigning 
European crown head in modern times

In modern times, none was heard among monarchs and its direct successors having a twin sibling. If the twins are a boy and a girl it would not pose so much problem as the apparent would be the boy, but what if the twins are identical?

Princess Sophie, wife of Prince Georg of Prussia, a non-reigning royal house in Germany, gave birth to twin sons in January 2013 and the one who came first becomes the first line successor to the royal house of Hohenzollern.

Now comes another set of twins of a reigning European crown head. Prince Albert is the reigning Sovereign Prince of Monaco and because his wife is carrying his first born and ultimately direct heirs, determining who will be chosen the heir-apparent would probably raise a little controversy.

Theories about twins varied down the decades. Some claimed that the one who will come out first is the youngest while the one who will come last is the eldest. However, the basis of choosing the heir is the time of birth, whoever comes first will be the first born.

It is not clear however if Princess Charlene is carrying a fraternal or identical twins. That's remains to be seen.

Saturday, September 13, 2014

The Impact of Scotland's Independence


Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom of 
Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
She has been on the British throne since 1952. She is also Head of State of the nations under the Commonwealth Realms most prominently, Australia, New Zealand and Canada. As a monarch, the Queen is above politics, she reigned but not governed and her duties are purely ceremonial, but her role is formidable, she can pardon offenders, dissolve a parliament and declare war, people under her territories are not citizens but subjects, and the oath of allegiance is not on the nation nor the government but on her. 

Once upon a time during the Tudor Dynasty, Henry VIII, decided to exclude his sister, Margaret, who by then married the Scottish King, James IV Stuart, and her descendants in the line of succession to the English throne because he did not want foreign rulers to occupy England. His fear of losing the throne to Scottish rulers came to life when his younger daughter, who ascended the throne as Elizabeth I, died without direct successors.

The English court restored Margaret's descendants to the line of succession and declared her grandson, James VI, as Elizabeth's legitimate successor. James VI became James I, the first Stuart monarch in England, and ultimately united the two Kingdoms forming the geographical name of Great Britain. Since then, all monarchs that followed, from Hanovers to Saxe-Coburg-Gothas to Windsors, were all descendants of the Stuarts, however not direct, as the founder of Hanover, who inherited the throne from the childless Queen Anne, the last of the Stuart, was a great grandson of James I. 

Prince William, the Duke of Cambridge, if fate would favor on him and would one day mount the British throne as William V, he would be the first monarch to directly descend from James I. William's mother, the late, Diana, Princess of Wales, was a Stuart descendant through her two direct ancestors, the Duke of Richmond and the Duke of Grafton, who were both sons of Charles II, grandson of James I.

Now centuries had passed and this part of English history might just be part of the old world, but sometimes history would repeat,  in a way that surprises everyone,  it could be in another twist but on the same pattern of circumstances.

Scotland indeed surprises the world with its intention to become an independent country, whatever the roots, reasons, arguments and justifications behind it, only the parliament and the Scottish MPs know and since royals supposed to be above politics, the Queen chose to remain silent on the issues.

And so do I...

I will just talk instead on what would be the impact of Scotland's impending independence to the royal family.

There are properties of the royal family in Scotland and most of the titles of its senior members are tied with the Scottish territories and history. The Queen's husband, Prince Philip,carries the title of the Duke of Edinburgh, a noble house that honors the capital of Scotland. The Queen's heir-apparent, Prince Charles, the Prince of Wales, has a secondary title of Duke of Rothesay, which had been used by the heir-apparent to the Scottish throne before the personal union of Scotland and England. The Queen's second son, Prince Andrew, the Duke of York, has a second title of Earl of Inverness, a Scottish Earldom and so Prince William, the Duke of Cambridge, who has a secondary title of Earl of Strathearn, another Scottish Earldom.

The fate of these titles might also depend on the extent of Scotland's draft of their constitution should the majority will vote for yes. It might be allowed to retain as their courtesy title, but will never use officially when they will visit Scotland. Prince Charles when in Scotland is always address as Duke of Rothesay, this will not be the case from then on if Scotland will officially separate from the United Kingdom,

The royal family has private properties in Scotland most prominently Balmoral Castle, the Queen's summer retreat. It is not part of the crown property as it is traditionally private and usually inherited by the monarch's eldest son. If Scotland will declare independence this will not be turned over to the government but this will be subjected to the government policies on real estate properties.

Scotland's move to become independent might set a precedent to Wales and Northern Ireland and the palace courtiers wanted to avoid this at all cost. Though the Queen is said to be just civil with the issues and does not want to influence the poll, her courtiers are singing a different tune and the palace machines seemed on the front line.


Just weeks before the poll is held, the palace announced that the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge are expecting their second child. The timing of the announcement was notorious and it was being viewed by some analysts as a contingency plan to catch up with those who want to stay under the turf of the British Kingdom.

Royal babies provide delight to the subjects and whatever news related to royal infants bring inspiration. I might be accused as insensitive or hostile, but I am referring to history. Royals never actually announce pregnancies unless being provoked by the media or if the "baby bump" is already evident, thus, the surprise announcement of the Kate's pregnancy is a sort of a rubbish. She could be pregnant but can the palace wait for her abdomen to show some bumps before they hastily made an announcement?

I remember when she was pregnant with Prince George, they tried avoiding the pregnancy issue and waited months before the palace confirmed the speculations. And now, before the media could print a single speculation on the changes of her body, a surprise announcement came up.

Oh, just an opinion....




Saturday, August 2, 2014

King Ludwig II of Bavaria and his Fairytale Castle



This story will be included in my upcoming e-book: European Royals: The Tale of Madness and Controversies

Was the King really mad? Or just merely eccentric?

King Ludwig II of Bavaria, from the royal house of Wittelsbach.
He was known in history as the Mad King.
He was deposed on the ground of mental illness, but the accusation lacked sufficient evidence as he was not clinically examined. He died mysteriously in the lake near Berg Castle south of Munich where he was imprisoned. His death was rolled a suicide though further evidence would tell he was murdered. 

A century had passed since his mysterious death but the story of this Bavarian King continued to fascinate modern royalists due to the controversial circumstances of his demise and the intriguing accusation of his mental insanity that was never proven true.

Here's a strip of the story of this controversial German royal.

Who could ever forget the classic story of King Ludwig II of Bavaria whose supposed madness had cost his throne and his life? 

He was best remembered for his devotion to art and architecture and known for his obsession of pompous castles and palaces, the most popular being the Neuschwanstein Castle, a fairy tale structure that perched above the rugged hills of Hohenschwangau in Bavaria, Munich, Germany. 

King Ludwig II ascended the Bavarian throne in 1864. He was often described in history as shy and timid and hated the trappings of royalty. He detested social gatherings and would often excuse himself from attending state occasions to watch theater plays of Richard Wagner, a German composer. He did not marry despite several attempts of his ministers and family to find a suitable royal bride. He preferred a life in seclusion at the comfort of his castle.

He was deposed on the ground of mental illness, but the manner in which Bavarian ministers handled his case was something of a controvery as it lacked sufficient evidence on the mental state of the King. Ludwig II was never clinically examined to verify his mental instability which made the deposition illegal. Evidences gathered were merely speculations like talking to imaginary people, sending his staff to a lengthy expedition just to research ideas for fantasy castles, letting his footmen dressed in ancient livery reminiscent to the costumes in the characters of Wagner's plays.

However, historians in later centuries would agree that the King could not be categorized as insane and mad but just eccentric and whimsical. He reportedly loved to spend most of his time day dreaming and would often withdraw to the comfort of his apartment in the Castle when the weight of the responsibility of being a King became too much for him. 

By most accounts, King Ludwig II was generally loved by many of his subjects in Bavaria. He adored nature, poetry and art and find happiness in romantic operas. He was especially close to his first cousin, The Empress Elisabeth of Austria.

Some would point that the stress of growing up in the royal family with rigorous royal training was the main cause of Ludwig’s peculiar behavior in adult life. He had at least an ancestor in the same category of peculiarity, his grandfather and namesake, King Ludwig I, who came from the family of eccentrics.



The King was brought to Berg Castle south of Munich after he was deposed but found dead on the following day in the Lake Starnberg. His death puzzled historians as the King was a good swimmer and the water was only deep waist. No water was found on the lungs of the King during the initial autopsy supporting earlier speculation that he was murdered. Years later, one note of a lone witness was revealed providing evidence that King Ludwig II was shot to death when he tried to escape.

Until the modern age, the life of this peculiar Bavarian monarch was a subject of curiosity that many royalists, including scholars, had expressed interest to conduct further studies on his reign and personal circumstances.
The breathtaking Neuschwanstein Castle in Bavaria, Germany
This fairytale castle was built under the supervision of King Ludwig II,
intended as his personal retreat and a homage to his favorite composer, Richard Wagner. The King wanted the construction of the castle to be perfect, so he commissioned theater artists to design the interior of the castle and rooms similar to the fairytale plays of Wagner.
Perched above the rugged cliff of Hohenschwangau in Bavaria, Germany,
the castle is surrounded with a magnificent landscape of lakes and parklands.
It has a walled garden and an artificial cave and its interior is beautifully designed
under a fairytale concept. Ironically, it was King Ludwig II's obsession of fairytale castles that had cost his life and throne. He was deposed on the ground of insanity. This castle was not finished at the time of his death but several years later it was opened to the public to raise income for the struggling state of Bavaria. Today, the castle drew thousands of tourists annually and became Europe's eternal symbol  of fairytale. It appeared several times in many fairytale movies. It also inspired the construction of Disneyland's Magic Kingdom.

His most ambitious project, the Neuschwanstein Castle, intended to be his private home and a personal homage to Richard Wagner, was made open to the public years after his death to raise income to the struggling state of Bavaria. Now, this castle, is one of the most popular tourist landmarks in the world and Europe's eternal symbol of fairytale. It's a living witness to King Ludwig II's fascination towards art and fantasy. 

King Ludwig II was succeeded by his younger brother Otto, but he too was deposed on the ground of mental illness. The throne passed to their first cousin, King Ludwig III and reigned until 1918 when all German princely states and Kingdoms were disbanded at the close of World War I. 

Today, the Bavarian throne is still in existence though not officially, and reduced to the status of a Dukedom. It is currently ruled by Prince Franz, the Duke of Bavaria, also considered as the rightful heir to the thrones of England, Scotland and Ireland through the Jacobite succession. Princess Sophie, the wife of Prince Alois, the Hereditary Prince of Liechtenstein, is Franz's niece.

More of this story and other interesting facts about European Royals in my upcoming e-book.

Saturday, July 12, 2014

Europe's New Queen Consorts


Europe has new Queen Consorts, both young, vibrant, highly cultured and glamorous, whose sudden ascent to fame as Their Majesties is attributed to the abdication of their respective parent-in-law.

The Netherlands

Queen Maxima is the wife of the current Dutch monarch, King Wilhelm-Alexander. She is an Argentinian by birth and had worked as an investment banker at Deutsche Bank in New York before she met the then Prince of Orange. Maxima is known for his gorgeous fashion style and taste. Her choice of wardrobe consistently put her on top of the list of the most glamorous female royals in Europe.

Queen Maxima of the Netherlands
Queen Maxima with husband, King Wilhelm-Alexander of the Netherlands

Her journey from the corporate world to the Dutch royal court was not an easy one. Her relationship with the future King was met with protest and disapproval from the parliament due to the rumoured involvement of her father, Jorge Zorreguieta, to the atrocities that happened in Argentina during the regime of President Jorge Videla. Maxima's father worked as a cabinet secretary of agriculture during the regime. Through series of investigation, it was revealed however that Zorreguieta was innocent with the accusation. 



The future King and Queen tied the knot on February 2, 2002 in Amsterdam without Maxima's father. The couple have three daughters, Catharina-Amalia, Hereditary Princess of Orange, Princess Alexia and Princess Arriane. Upon her husband ascension to the throne in April 2013, Maxima became the first Dutch Queen Consort in more than 100 years since Queen Emma in 1890. 

Queen Maxima currently serves as Secretary General on Special Advocate for Inclusive Finance for Development in the United Nations. Despite being married to a protestant King, Maxima remained a Roman Catholic. Through her father, Maxima has five line of descent from King Alfonso XIII of Portugal. 

Belgium

Queen Mathilde is the only current Queen Consort in Europe that has a noble ancestry. She descended from the long list of Lords, Barons and Counts and her father is a titled Baron. She has a Princess as a grandmother on her mother's side.

The 41-year-old Queen Consort is known with her very professional approach to the media, with finesse and proper etiquette, she never generated controversy and her attitude towards the public has been touted as always formal and warm.

Queen Mathilde and King Philippe of Belgium

Queen Mathilde has a master's degree in psychology and before her marriage to Prince Philippe in 1999, she worked as a speech therapist. Their Majesties have four children together: Princess Elisabeth, the Duchess of Brabant and the heir-apparent, Prince Gabriel, Prince Emmanuel and Princess Eleonore.

Spain

With the abdication of King Juan Carlos last June 2, 2014, Europe loses the only Queen Consort in modern times who was royal by birth. Queen Sophia is the last true-blooded Princess to marry into the present-day European royal court, she is a former Greek princess, eldest daughter of King Paul of Greece and niece of Prince Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh (husband of Queen Elizabeth II of Britain).

The reigning Spanish King, Felipe VI, only son of King Juan Carlos and Queen Sophia, married a commoner with no aristocratic background, Letezia Ortiz Rocasolano, a former TV news anchor. Just like in the Netherlands, Felipe's relationship to Letezia also generated controversies. She was previously married to a college professor but obtained divorce before she met the future Spanish King. A situation found by many as slightly uneventful and inappropriate for a woman who would become a wife of a future King. Nonetheless, King Juan Carlos gave his permission and the marriage proceeded without opposition on May 22, 2004.

King Felipe VI and Queen Letezia of Spain

Queen Letezia is the first Queen Consort of Spain who is a commoner. But through out the years that she assumed the title of Princess of Asturias, she projected an image and reputation of a highly dignified woman with a strong sense of character, duty and refinement, thus earning respect and admiration from the public. She and King Felipe have two daughters: Princess Leonor and Infanta Sofia.

Sunday, July 6, 2014

The Legend of Dracula

This story is part of the chapter in my e-book about European Royals: The Royal Madness.
The world knows Dracula was written by Bram Stoker, an Irish novelist, but it was not clear however if Stoker really based the concept of the story on Prince Vlad III, who waged a reign of terror in Wallachia during the 15th century. Wallachia was once an ancient principality in Central Europe that was known later as Transylvania (and now part of Romania), the setting of Dracula.
Sketch of Vlad III, though no records accurately show 
how he looked like exactly
Trivia: Did you know that the name DRACULA is not really mean "devil" in ancient Wallachia? This word means "son of the dragon". Dracul means dragon, an ancient chivalric order in Wallachia use to defend Christianity against invaders. Vlad III's father was a famous member of this group. 
Dracula started to achieve an evil reputation translation when Bram Stoker published a book about a Transylvanian Count with a voodoo history.

Here's the strip of Vlad III's story which I included in the chapter of my e-book about madness in the royal court.
If there’s one horrid story about mental derangement crossing the border of sadistic insanity, it's Vlad III's story. The saga of his vampirism act was so popular in Europe even during the 17th century that it inspired Bram Stoker to write a novel about a horrendous man that drinks blood, Dracula.
If we would combine the sadistic nature of Ivan The Terrible of Russia and the psychotic maladies of Caligula of Rome, we will get a dose of terror with Vlad III of Wallachia. He was dreadful and gruesome and if there’s anything maddening about protecting the Kingdom from invaders, it was Vlad III’s historical legacy of resorting to impaling.
Whether Stoker really based his novel to a Voodoo Prince in Wallachia that finds pleasure in torturing people with his spikes, no one really knew exactly, it was only a speculation, but the story of Count Dracula is somewhat closer to Vlad III’s vampirism tendencies.
Vlad III was Prince of Wallachia, now part of Romania in Central Europe, from 1452 to his death, with deposition and exile in-betweens, making him to rule the tiny principality for about three times. He reigned during the troubled period of 15th century when invasion, wars and chaos were popular in the continent.
His father was Vlad II, the Dracul, which means Dragon because he was a member of the Order of the Dragon, a chivalric order founded to protect Christianity in Eastern Europe. Vlad III was known as Dracula, meaning son of the dragon, but in later decades the name dragon was replaced with “devil” referring to the vicious crimes of murders and tortures committed by Vlad III during his reign, thus, Dracula in the present time means “son of the devil.”
During his youth, Wallachia suffered discord from rival factions and his father was ousted in 1442. He regained the throne after securing support from Ottoman by agreeing to pay a tribute. Part of this loyalty was sending his two sons, Vlad and Radu, to the Ottoman court. It was in this exile that the young Vlad was trained and learned skills in warfare.
Vlad II was murdered  by the faction of John Hunyadi, a Hungarian regent, it ignited another war in Wallachia, Ottoman rescued the principality and put Vlad III on the throne. What followed next was a series of uproar and disturbances that shaped Vlad III’s personality and reputation in later years. His life was dominated with the terror of war, political unrest and murders that the only way to survive is to become awful and hostile.
He returned to Wallachia and regained the throne only to find a miserable land devastated by poverty, widespread crime and  depressing agricultural fall out. Realizing it could never be amended with systematic and lenient governance, he decided to austere methods to restore progress.
His reign was not entirely troublesome and grisly, there were also periods that his people experienced harmony, development and fairness particularly in the trading, economy and infrastructure. He created several reform measures especially among merchants. But despite turning his attention to Wallachia’s reforms and development, he did not forget the group that killed his father and brother which he believed had also caused trouble in his land, the Boyars. 
To secure peace and order and to strengthen his reign, he had most of the Boyars nobles killed and gradually became harsh in creating laws for criminals and offenders. It was during this period that he started implementing his severe punishment of executing enemies through impaling.
The most brutal part of this way of execution was the spikes that boiled in oil to implicate horrible pain to the victims. At the height of his cruelty and Dracula streak, he would held a feast in the forest and kill everyone leaving the corpses to rot in the ground.
He had reportedly killed close to 100,000 people mostly in a grisly way, torturing, impaling and burning at stake. At one point, he made a killing rampage along Danube, burning houses, killing everyone he found in the village, men, women, old, young, infant.
His sadistic pleasure in torturing was unimaginable. He had children roasted and fed to their mothers, cut off the breasts of women and forced the husband to eat it and had them all impaled. His reputation for cruelty horrified even his enemies, it was reported that when invaders discovered impaled corpses on the banks of Danube river, they were sickened with what they saw and retreated in fright.
Vlad III paid a high prize though. When he engaged in a battle against the Turks, he was killed and beheaded and had his severely mutilated head brought to Constantinople to present to the Sultan who had wished nothing but Vlad III's downfall and death.
More of the undiscovered stories of terror and madness in the European royal court in my upcoming e-book: European Royals: Madness and Intrigues